Published Jan 20, 2018
Paul Oakley Deed Harrison Jason Haas Suzanna Listenma


Objective: To discuss the case of a patient diagnosed with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) and chronic tic disorder that showed positive improvements following Chiropractic Biophysics® technique (CBP) interventions designed to correct/improve a cervical kyphosis.Clinical Features: A 19-year old male was diagnosed with GTS and chronic tic disorder at age 14 by a medical general practitioner. He was treated unsuccessfully by both Haloperidol as well as previous spinal manipulative therapy. The tics were simple phonic, simple and complex motor, and were present “almost always†and overall impairment on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) was rated at 40%. A lateral cervical radiograph showed a cervical kyphosis with anterior head posture.Intervention and Outcome: The patient was treated by CBP technique protocol and procedures. The patient received 81 treatments over the course of 12-weeks. At the 3-month re-exam, a change to a cervical lordosis and reduced anterior head posture was observed on follow up radiography. The YGGTS showed significant improvement in tics and were present “frequently†and overall impairment was rated at 20%. Additionally, the patient was able to self-reduce the needed dose of Haloperidol by 50%. A 13-year follow-up indicated the patient was able to discontinue use of medication permanently and had remained well.Conclusion: The patient experienced significant reduction in symptoms and improvement in quality of life. Additionally, the MD prescribing Haloperidol concluded that the reduction in symptoms was significant enough to discontinue the medication. These changes in function may be related to the correction of cervical kyphosis.
Abstract 297 | PDF Downloads 279



Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, Chronic tic disorder, Cervical kyphosis

1. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed) 1994 APA
2. Cavanna AE, Seri S. Tourette's syndrome. Br Med J 2013 Aug 20;347:f4964.
3. Robertson MM. The Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: the current status. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2012t;97(5):166-175
4. Hartmann A, Martino D, Murphy T. Gilles de la Tourette syndrome - A treatable condition? Rev Neurol (Paris). 2016;172(8-9):446-454
5. Storch EA, Murphy TK, Geffken GR et al. Reliability and validity of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale. Psychol Assess 2005;17(4):486-491
6. Leckman JF, Riddle MA, Hardin MT, et al. The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale: initial testing of a clinician-rated scale of tic severity. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1989;28(4):566-573

7. Harrison DD. Abnormal postural permutations calculated as rotations and translations from an ideal normal upright static spine. In: Sweere JJ, ed. Chiropractic Family Practice. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers, 1992:1-22
8. Harrison DE, Harison DD, Cailliet R, et al. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine 2000;25:2072-8
9. Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ, Holland B. Comparisons of lordotic cervical spine curvatures to a theoretical ideal model of the static sagittal cervical spine. Spine 1996;21:667-675
10. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Hass J. CBP Structural rehabilitation of the cervical spine. 1 ed. Evanston, WY: Harrison CBP Seminars, 2002
11. Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Harrison GR, Troyanovich S, Harrison DE, and Harrison SO. Chiropractic biophysics technique: a linear algebra approach to posture in chiropractic. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1996;19:525-35
12. Oakley PA, Harrison DD, Harrison DE, Haas JW. Evidence-based protocol for structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: review of clinical biomechanics of posture (CBP) publications. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2005;49(4):270-296
13. Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Holland B. A new 3-point bending traction method for restoring cervical lordosis and cervical manipulation: a nonrandomized clinical controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(4):447-53
14. Breig, A. Adverse biomechanical tension in the central nervous system. Analysis of cause and effect. Relief by functional neurosurgery. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1978
15. Bulut MD, Alpayci M, Şenköy E, et al. decreased vertebral artery hemodynamics in patients with loss of cervical lordosis. Med Sci Monit 2016;22:495-500
16. Kobayashi S, Yoshizawa H, Hachiya S, Ukai T, Morita T. Vasogenic edema induced by compression injury to the spinal nerve root. Distrubtion of intravenously injected protein tracers and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 1993;18:1410-24
17. Matsui T, Takahashi K, Moriya M, Tanaka S, Kawahara N, Tomita K. Quantitative analysis of edema in the dorsal nerve roots induced by acute mechanical compression. Spine 1998;23:1931-1936
18. Kikuchi S, Konno S, Kayama S, Sato K, Olmarker K. Increased resistance to acute compression injury in chronically compressed spinal nerve roots. An experimental study. Spine 1996;21:2544-2550
19. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Holm S, Bagge U. Effects of experimental compression on blood flow in spinal nerve roots. A vital microscopic study on the porcine cauda equine. J Orthop Res 1989;7:817-823
20. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Holm S. Edema formation in spinal nerve roots induced by experimental, graded compression. An experimental study on the pig cauda equine with special reference to differences in effects between rapid and slow onset of compression. Spine 1989;14:569-573
21. Rydevik B, Brown MD, Lundborg G. Pathoanatomy and pathophysiology of nerve root compression. Spine 1984;9:7-15
22. Matsui H, Olmarker K, Cornefjord M, Takahashi K, Rydevik B. Local electrophysiologic stimulation in experimental double level cauda equine compression. Spine 1992;17:1075-1078
23. Olmarker K, Holm S, Rydevik B. Importance of compression onset rate for the degree of impairment of impulse propagation in experimental compression injury of the porcine cauda equine. Spine 1990;15:416-9
24. Olmarker K, Holm S, Rydevik B, Bagge U. Restoration of intrinsic blood flow during gradual decompression of the porcine cauda equine. Neuro-Orthopedics 1991;10:83-7
25. Stein JS. Failure of magnetic resonance imaging to reveal the cause of a progressive cervical myelopathy related to postoperative spinal deformity. Am J Phys Med Rehab 1997;76:73-75
26. Breig A, Turnbull I, Hassler O. Effects of mechanical stresses on the spinal cord in cervical spondylosis: A study on fresh cadaver material. J Neurosurg 1966;25:45-56
27. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ. Cervical coupling during lateral head translation creates an S-configuration. Clinical Biomechanics 2000;15:436-440
28. Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, et al. A review of biomechanics of the central nervous system--part II: spinal cord strains from postural loads. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999 Jun;22(5):322-332
29. Grosso MJ, Hwang R, Mroz T, Benzel E, Steinmetz MP. Relationship between degree of focal kyphosis correction and neurological outcomes for patients undergoing cervical deformity correction surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2013 Jun;18(6):537-544
30. Smith JS, Lafage V, Ryan DJ, et al. Association of myelopathy scores with cervical sagittal balance and normalized spinal cord volume: analysis of 56 preoperative cases from the AOSpine North America Myelopathy study. Spine 2013;38(22 Suppl 1):S161-170
31. Moustafa IM, Diab AA, Taha S, Harrison DE. Addition of a sagittal cervical posture corrective orthotic device to a multimodal rehabilitation program improves short- and long-term outcomes in patients with discogenic cervical radiculopathy. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017;53(1):57-71