COMMENTARY: IS EBM DAMAGING THE SOCIAL CONSCIENCE OF CHIROPRACTIC?

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 15, 2016
Phillip Ebrall

Abstract

Introduction: One expression of the social conscience of chiropractic is the provision by chiropractic educational institutions of low-cost or free chiropractic care to disadvantaged communities. It is expected that institutions offer to all patients the same full standard of care that is the hallmark of traditional chiropractic. Objective: To explore whether an observed schism occurring within chiropractic education, where a minority of institutions are minimising the major premise of the discipline and replacing it with an emphasis on only the science or literature component of the evidence-based triad, has any potential impact on the quality of care provided particularly within the charitable context. Data Sources and Synthesis: The indexed literature supplemented by informal literature, news reports, URLs identified by on-line searching, personal communication and key informants. A contextual narrative identifies themes which combine to suggest the healing component of the chiropractic encounter may be compromised. Concern is also expressed that students in those institutions which have removed the major premise of chiropractic from their curriculum may experience compromise in their learning which may negatively impact patient care. Conclusion: The social conscience of chiropractic may be compromised by undue emphasis on science and the relegation of traditional concepts as historical artefacts. Academic chiropractors seem yet to address potential consequences. (Chiropr J Australia 2016;44:203-213)
Abstract 237 | PDF Downloads 145

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Chiropractic, Medical History, Evidence-Based Practice

References
1. Sackett DL. Evidence-based medicine. Semin Perinatol 1997;21(1):3-5.
2. World Federation of Chiropractic. https://www.wfc.org/website/?option=com_content&view=article&id=141&Itemid=140&lang=en Accessed June 19, 2016.
3. European schools sign anti-subluxation position statement. News. The Chronicle of Chiropractic. Foundation for Vertebral Subluxation. May 17, 2015:14:43. http://chiropractic.prosepoint.net/113734 Accessed June 19, 2016.
4. World Federation of Chiropractic. News. https://www.wfc.org/website/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=314%3Awfc-athens-congress-a-huge-success&catid=56%3Anews--publications&Itemid=27&lang=en Accessed June 19, 2016.
5. Harrison E. Remarks upon the different appearances of the back, breast and ribs, in persons affected with spinal diseases: and on the effects of spinal distortion on the sanguineous circulation. London Med Physicians J 1820;14:365-78.
6. Harrison E. Pathological impractical observations on spinal diseases. London, Thomas & George Underwood. 1827. Original edition provided courtesy of the McDowall personal collection, Canberra Australia.
7. Palmer DD. The Chiropractor's Adjuster (also called The Text-Book of the Science, Art and Philosophy of Chiropractic). Portland Printing House, 1910. Original edition provided courtesy of the McDowall personal collection, Canberra Australia.
8. The Rubicon Group. http://www.therubicongroup.org/#/about-us/ Accessed June 19, 2016.
9. What is chiropractic? Welsh Institute of Chiropractic, University of South Wales. http://wioc.southwales.ac.uk/whatischiro/ Accessed June 19, 2016.
10. Prospectus 2017/18. Why chiropractic. Anglo-European College of Chiropractic. Bournemouth. 2016: 9. http://www.aecc.ac.uk/cdn/Prospectus/AECC%20Prospectus%20201718.pdf Accessed June 19, 2016.
11. The Chronicle of Chiropractic. Foundation for Vertebral Subluxation. May 15, 2016 - 15:44. http://chiropractic.prosepoint.net/136238 Accessed June 19, 2016.
12. Studienævnet for Klinisk Biomekanik. Southern Danish University (Syddansk Universitet). In Danish and unavailable in English. http://www.sdu.dk/en/
13. Universitätsklinik Balgrist. Zürich. http://www.balgrist.ch/en/Home/Weitere_Kompetenzen/Chiropraktik.aspx Accessed June 19, 2016.
14. Kessinger RC. An autoimmune approach for care of a patient presenting with lichen planopilaris [case report]. Nutr Perspect 39; 2:15-16,18-20.
15. Cunningham KM, Chavan GB, Ainsworth KE. Benign sacrococcygeal teratoma incidentally found on routine scoliosis radiographs in a 12-year-old female [case report]. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2016;601: Online access only p 21-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4807676/ Accessed Jun 19, 2016.
16. Parisio-Ferraro AL, Alcantara J. The chiropractic care of an infant female with a medical diagnosis of strabismus [case report]. Chiropr J Aust 2013;43: 15-18. http://www.chiroindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CJA_43_1.pdf Accessed Jun 19, 2016.
17. Rome PL. Animal chiropractic neutralises the claim of placebo effect of spinal manipulation: Historical perspectives [review]. Chiropr J Aust 2012;42(1):15-20. http://cjaonline.realviewdigital.com/?iid=60759 Accessed June 19, 2016.
18. Crothers AL, French S, Herbert JJ, Walker BF. Spinal manipulative therapy, Graston technique® and placebo for non- specific thoracic spine pain: a randomised controlled trial. Chiropr Man Ther 201624: 16. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0096-9. http://chiromt.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12998-016-0096-9 Accessed June 19, 2016.
19. About. Chiropr Man Ther. http://chiromt.biomedcentral.com/about Accessed June 19, 2016.
20. Jaffer U, Camerson AEP. Deceit and fraud in medical research. Int J Surg 2006;4(2): 122–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.02.004.
21. Novella S. The Lancet retracts Andrew Wakefield’s article [posting]. Science-based Med. 2010;29. https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/lancet-retracts-wakefield-article/ Accessed Jun 19, 2016.
22. Zwolsman S, te Pas E, Hooft L, Wieringa-de Ward M, van Dijk N. Barriers to GPs' use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. Br J Gen Prac 2012;62(200): e511-e21.
23. Tonelli MR. The philosophic limits of evidence-based medicine. Acad Med 1998; 73:1234-40.
24. Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 2014;348:g3725.
25. Fuller J, Flores LF, Upshur REG, Goldenberg MJ. Renaissance or reformation for evidence based medicine? BMJ 2014;349:g4902.
26. Tonelli MR, Callahan TC. Why alternative medicine cannot be evidence-based. Acad Med 2001;76:1213–20.
27. Rosner AL. Evidence-based medicine: Revisiting the pyramid of priorities. J Bodywork Movement Ther 2012;16(1): 42-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.05.003.
28. Sackett DL. Campaign to revitalise academic medicine BMJ 2004:329;924.
29. Conable KM, Rosner A. A narrative review of manual muscle testing and implications for muscle testing research [review]. J Chiropr Med 2011;10(3): 157-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259988/ Accessed June 19, 2016.
30. Cuthbert S. Applied Kinesiology essentials. Pueblo, TheGangasasPress. 2013.
31. Smith M, Carber LA. Survey of US chiropractor attitudes and behaviors about subluxation. J Chiropr Hum 2008;15:19-26.
32. Gliedt JA, Hawk C, Anderson M, Amad K, Bunn D, et al. Chiropractic identity, role and future: a survey of North American chiropractic students. Chiropr Man Ther 2015;23(4):1-8. http://www.chirobase.org/02Research/subluxation_survey.pdf Accessed June 19, 2016.
33. Rome PR. Usage of chiropractic terminology in the literature: 296 ways to say ‘subluxation: Complex issues of the vertebral subluxation. Chiropr Tech 1996;8(2):49-60.
34. Haavik H, Murphy B.The role of spinal manipulation in addressing disordered sensorimotor integration and altered motor control. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2012;5:768-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Apr 6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22483612 Accessed Jun 19, 2016.
35. Pierce B. The adjustment survey results are in… shocking to say the least. Circle of Docs. 2016. http://circleofdocs.com/the-adjustment-survey-results-are-in-shocking-to-say-the-least/ Accessed June 19, 2016.
36. Owens Jr EF, Hosek RS, Sullivan SGB, Russell BS, Mulin LE, et al. Establishing force and speed training targets for lumbar spine high-velocity, low-amplitude chiropractic adjustments. J Chiropr Educ 2016;30(1):7-13.
37. Gatterman MI. Foundations of chiropractic: Subluxation. 2e. St Louis, Elsevier Mosby. 2005.
38. Leach RA. The chiropractic theories. 4e. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2004.
39. Haldeman S. ED. Principles and practice of chiropractic. 3e. New York, McGraw-Hill. 2005.
40. Mirtz TA, Perle SM. The prevalence of the term subluxation in North American English-Language Doctor of chiropractic programs. Chiropr Man Ther 2011;19:1-7. http://chiromt.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2045-709X-19-14 Accessed June 19, 2016.
41. Seaman DR. A contemporary view of subluxation that is consistent with the founder’s views: a commentary. J Vert Sublux Res 2004;9:Online access only. http://vertebralsubluxation.sharepoint.com/Pages/2004_1071_seaman.aspx Accessed June 19, 2016.
42. Ebrall PS. Towards better teaching about the subluxation complex. Chiropr J Aust 2009;39:165-70.
43. Massimi M. Saving unobservable phenomena. Br J Philos Sci 2007;58(2): 235-62 first published online May 21, 2007 doi:10.1093/bjps/axm013.
44. Lantz CA. The vertebral subluxation complex. ICA Rev 1989;45(4):37-61.
45. Jull G, Zito G, Trott P, Potter H, Shirley D. Inter-examiner reliability to detect painful upper cervical joint dysfunction. Aust J Physiother 1997;43(3):125-9.
46. Hartley J. Chiropractic therapy for thoracic spine pain no better than placebo. News report. Australian Doctor 2016. http://www.australiandoctor.com.au/news/latest-news/chiropractic-treatment-for-thoracic-spine-pain-no Accessed June 19, 2016.
47. Hafferty FW, O’Donnell JF. The hidden curriculum in health professional education. Hanover, NH, Dartmouth College Press. 2014. ISBN: 978-1-61168-659-6.
Section
Articles